Cite Score:
0.7
CITE SCORE SCOPUS

Accessory Gene Regulator Specificity Groups Among Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Hospitalized Children

AUTHORS

Abdolmajid Ghasemian 1 , Shahin Najar Peerayeh 1 , * , Bita Bakhshi 1 , Mohsen Mirzaee 1

1 Department of Bacteriology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, IR Iran

How to Cite: Ghasemian A, Najar Peerayeh S, Bakhshi B, Mirzaee M. Accessory Gene Regulator Specificity Groups Among Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Hospitalized Children, Arch Pediatr Infect Dis. 2014 ; 2(4):e16096. doi: 10.5812/pedinfect.16096.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases: 2 (4); e16096
Published Online: April 26, 2014
Article Type: Research Article
Received: November 10, 2013
Revised: January 20, 2014
Accepted: February 24, 2014
Crossmark

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Background: Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) especially those with methicillin resistance are human pathogens capable of causing a wide variety of diseases, ranging from mild skin lesions to systemic and fatal infections.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to detect the accessory gene regulator (agr) specificity groups among methicillin resistant and susceptible S. aureus isolated from children.

Materials and Methods: During July 2012 to January 2013, 22 S. aureusc linical isolates were collected from children aged between 2 to 11, in Loghman Hospital of Tehran. Antibiogram test was performed using disc diffusion method. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was conducted to detect mecA gene and agr specificity groups.

Results: Among 22 S. aureus clinical isolates collected from children, five isolates (22.7 %) were resistant to methicillin. fourteen isolates (63.6%) were resistant to amoxicillin and all were susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid. Agr specificity group I was detected in 12 (54.5%) isolates (in 2 MRSA and 10 MSSA isolates), agr group II in four (18%, in 3 MSSA and 1 MRSA), group III in 3 (9%, 2 in MSSA and one in MRSA), while agr specificity group IV was found in three (13.6%, 2 MSSA and 1 MRSA) isolates.

Conclusions: The agr specific group I had the highest rate of detection among pathogens isolated from hospitalized children in Tehran.

Keywords

Staphylococcus aureus Drug Resistance, Microbial pathogenesis mecA gene

Copyright © 2014, Pediartric Infections Research Center. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Background

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is one of the most important infectious agents in nosocomial infections, causing a wide variety of clinical signs ranging from mild to systemic and potentially fatal disorders either from invasion or toxin production; especially in patients with compromised immune systems or disabilities (1, 2). Methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates are versatile pathogens with high resistance rates to antibiotic therapy. MRSA isolates are nosocomial and community acquired and considered as a threat to healthcare settings (3). Community associated MRSA isolates can cause virulent infections and may spread more easily from person to person or cause more skin disease (due to Panton- Valentine Leukocidin toxin) (4). MRSA isolates are resistant to the beta-lactam antibiotics by producing penicillin binding protein 2a (PBP2a) with significantly reduced affinity for these antibiotics (5). PBP2a is encoded by staphylococcal cassete chromosome mec (SCCmec). Colonization and pathogenicity of S. aureus is a complex process involving a diverse array of virulence factors controlled by a network of virulence regulators (6). Quorum sensing is a process of cell-cell communication that enables bacteria to recognize cell density and response to extracellular signaling molecules called autoinducers. The many processes controlled by quorum sensing include bioluminescence, biofilm formation, antibiotic production, competence, sporulation and virulence factor production (7). Quorum sensing in S. aureus is based on the agr system that encoded by the agr locus. The accessory gene regulator (agr) is an important gene regulator by encoding the specific peptide called auto-inducing peptide (AIP). As an important quorum sensing system, this gene regulator is a chromosomal locus comprising of two transcripts called RNAII and RNAIII. RNAII operon (or P2 promoter) which is sensitive to AIP concentration, encodes agr A, B, C and D. AIP is encoded by agr D gene, then post-translationally modified or processed by agr B product. However, agr C component encodes a histidine kinase (agr C), a sensor for auto inducer peptide and activates agr A. The response regulator that activates P2 or P3 promoters is the agr A component. Regulation of either of these promoters subsequently leads to RNAII or RNAIII transcription (8). The adhesive surface proteins are regulated positively by RNAIII transcript during logarithmic phase of growth. There are suggestions about the correlation between agr groups and the kind of infection (3, 4).

2. Objectives

This study was conducted to detect the agr specificity groups among methicillin resistant and susceptible children S. aureus isolates.

3. Materials and Methods

From July 2012 to January 2013, a total number of 22 S. aureus clinical isolates were collected from trachea (14 isolates), blood cultures (4 isolates), skin lesions (2 isolates) and sputum (2 isolates) from hospitalized children (13 male and 9 female) with different clinical signs, aged between 2 to 11 years, in Loghman Hospital of Tehran. The identification tests were conducted by conventional tests (catalase, slide and tube coagulases, growth on mannitol salt agar and DNase tests). Antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed by Kirby Bauer assay (disk diffusion method), according to clinical and laboratory standards institute (CLSI) guidelines. S. aureus ATCC 25923 was used as control strain in this study. The discs used in this study included: oxacillin (1 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), clindamycin (2 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), vancomycin (2 µg), linezolid (30 µg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (10 µg), amoxicillin (10 µg), gentamycin (120 µg) and ciprofloxacin (5 µg) (from MAST, UK). DNA extraction was performed by boiling method (TE buffer [Tris-Hcl + EDTA, pH 8] and lysostaphin [2 µg/mL, 20 µL]) (9), and then the DNA was stored at -20°C. PCR assay was performed to detect mecA gene and agr specificity groups (by duplex PCR). Primers for mecA and agr specificity groups has been shown in Table 1 (3, 10, 11).

Table 1. Specific Primers Used for Detection of mecA Gene and agr Specificity Groups
PrimerSequence 5′3′Size (bp)
mecA
F: GTG AAG ATA TAC CAA GTG ATT147
R: ATG CGC TATAGATTGAAA GGA
agrI
F: ATGCACATGGTGCACATGC440
R: GTCACAAGTACTATAAGCTGCGAT
agrII
F: ATGCACATGGTGCACATGC572
R: GTATTACTAATTGAAAAGTGCCATAGC
agrIII
F: ATGCACATGGTGCACATGC406
R: CTGTTGAAAAAGTCAACTAAAAGCTC
agrIV
F: ATGCACATGGTGCACATGC588
R: CGATAATGCCGTAATAC CCG

3.1. Data Analysis

Data were analyzed by Pearson Chi-Square. A P value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

4. Results

The antibiotic susceptibility pattern was as follows: resistance to amoxicillin was observed in 14 isolates (63.6%), tetracycline in eight (36.3%), ciprofloxacin in five (22.7%), gentamycin in four (18%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in four (18%), erythromycin in six (27.2%) and clindamycin in four (18%) isolates. All o isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid. MRSA isolates were detected with oxacillin disk (1 µg) during disk diffusion and then confirmed by detection of mecA gene. In 12 (54.5%) isolates which had 440 bp in electrophoresis, agr group I was found. Among these, 10 isolates (55.6%) were MSSA and two (50% of MRSA isolates) were MRSA. Three MSSA isolates (16.7%) and one MRSA (25%) belonged to agr group II. In three isolates (11.11% of MSSA and 25% of MRSA) agr specificity group III was detected, while agr specificity group IV was detected in four (18%) isolates, involving two MSSA (11.7%) and one MRSA (25%). Table 2 shows the characteristics of five MRSA isolates all were resistant to at least 6 antibiotics of which two resistant to the all, except for linezolid and vancomycin. Four isolates belonged to agr specific group I and one isolate to agr group IV. Prevalence of agr specific groups in MRSA and MSSA is presented in Table 3. There was no statistical significant difference between methicillin resistant and susceptible clinical isolates regarding presence of agr groups (P = 0.13). Furthermore, there was no relationship between infection types and agr groups (Figures 1 and 2).

Table 2. Characteristics of MRSA Isolated From Children a
Isolates (MRSA)Clinical SampleSexagr GroupsAntibiotic Resistance
1BloodMIT, A, CD, E, CIP, GM
2LesionFIVT, A, CD, E, CIP, GM
3TracheaMIT, A, CD, SXT, E, CIP, GM
4LesionMIT, A, CD, SXT, E, CIP, GM
5TracheaMIT, A, CD, SXT, E, CIP

aAbbreviations: A, amoxicillin; CD, clindamycin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; E, erythromycin; GM, gentamycin; SXT, trimethoprim- sulfamethoxazole; T, tetracycline.

Table 3. Prevalence of agr Specificity Groups in MRSA and MSSAa
Isolates agr Iagr IIagr IIIagr IV
MSSA (n = 17)10 (55.6)3 (16.7)2 (11.11)2 (12)
MRSA (n = 5)2 (40)1 (20)1 (20)1 (20)
Total (n = 22)12 (54.5)4 (18)3 (9)3 (18)

a Data are presented as No. (%).

Figure 1. Electrophoresis of agr groups I and IV PCR Products (Duplex PCR)
Electrophoresis of agr groups I and IV PCR Products (Duplex PCR)

M: marker. Line 1-5: agr specificity groups I with 440 bp, and Line 6-8: agr group IV by 588 bp.

Figure 2. Electrophoresis of agr groups II and III
Electrophoresis of agr groups II and III

Line1: marker, 2, 4: agr groups III (406 bp), and line 3 and 5: agr group II (572 bp).

5. Discussion

Community acquired methicillin resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA) can affect healthy children with high morbidity and mortality (12). In the present study, all isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid and had high resistance to amoxicillin, suggesting the presence of plasmids encoding beta-lactamases, easily transmitted to other strains. There was higher antibiotic resistance in MRSA isolates, such as aminoglycosides and tetracycline. This is especially common in hospital associated isolates (13). These findings were also confirmed by Adebayo’s study, in which all isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid, and also antibiotic resistance was more prevalent in MRSA strains (14). Armin reported resistance to vancomycin and linezolid (15). Quorum sensing system regulates staphylococcal virulence factors. This system participates in staphylococcal scaled skin syndrome (agr specificity groups III), exfoliative toxin production (agr group IV), and encoding surface proteins (16-18). Also, agr group I was the most prevalent specific group (54.5%), due to present study’s findings, confirming previous surveys (19). In the Ho CM study, 91.6% of the clinical isolates had agr group I (20). Also in the Barbara study, 45.7% of the clinical isolates were agrI positive (21). This group has been detected mostly in suppurated infections such as endocarditis (3). The second prevalent groups were agr groups II and IV (18% and 13.6%, respectively). Group II agr has been more associated to respiratory infections, especially in community acquired MRSA (3, 22). The rate of group III prevalence was 9% which has been shown to be prevalent in isolates with active vancomycin resistance mechanisms (7). Quorum sensing system leads Staphylococcus aureus to express virulence factors (23), alter the antibiotic susceptibility pattern, resist the immune system and form biofilm. It was shown that agr group I is the most frequent specific group among children, also the most prevalent group in MSSA and MRSA isolates and there was no statistically significant difference between two groups, while MRSA strains had significantly higher antibiotic resistance.

Acknowledgements

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Ghaznavi-Rad E, Nor Shamsudin M, Sekawi Z, Khoon LY, Aziz MN, Hamat RA, et al. Predominance and emergence of clones of hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Malaysia. J Clin Microbiol. 2010; 48(3) : 867 -72 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 2.

    Gordon RJ, Lowy FD. Pathogenesis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 46 Suppl 5 -9 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 3.

    Ghaznavi-Rad E, Nor Shamsudin M, Sekawi Z, van Belkum A, Neela V. A simplified multiplex PCR assay for fast and easy discrimination of globally distributed staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec types in meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Med Microbiol. 2010; 59 : 1135 -9 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 4.

    Labandeira-Rey M, Couzon F, Boisset S, Brown EL, Bes M, Benito Y, et al. Staphylococcus aureus Panton-Valentine leukocidin causes necrotizing pneumonia. Science. 2007; 315(5815) : 1130 -3 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 5.

    Kim C, Milheirico C, Gardete S, Holmes MA, Holden MT, de Lencastre H, et al. Properties of a novel PBP2A protein homolog from Staphylococcus aureus strain LGA251 and its contribution to the beta-lactam-resistant phenotype. J Biol Chem. 2012; 287(44) : 36854 -63 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 6.

    Robinson DA, Monk AB, Cooper JE, Feil EJ, Enright MC. Evolutionary genetics of the accessory gene regulator (agr) locus in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 2005; 187(24) : 8312 -21 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 7.

    Yu D, Zhao L, Xue T, Sun B. Staphylococcus aureus autoinducer-2 quorum sensing decreases biofilm formation in an icaR-dependent manner. BMC Microbiol. 2012; 12 : 288 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 8.

    Tsompanidou E, Sibbald MJ, Chlebowicz MA, Dreisbach A, Back JW, van Dijl JM, et al. Requirement of the agr locus for colony spreading of Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 2011; 193(5) : 1267 -72 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 9.

    Chapaval L, Moon DH, Gomes JE, Duarte FR, Tsai SM. An alternative method for Staphylococcus aureus DNA isolation. Arq Bras Med Vet Zoo. 2008; 60 : 299 -306

  • 10.

    Shopsin B, Mathema B, Alcabes P, Said-Salim B, Lina G, Matsuka A, et al. Prevalence of agr specificity groups among Staphylococcus aureus strains colonizing children and their guardians. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41(1) : 456 -9 [PubMed]

  • 11.

    Zhang K, Sparling J, Chow BL, Elsayed S, Hussain Z, Church DL, et al. New quadriplex PCR assay for detection of methicillin and mupirocin resistance and simultaneous discrimination of Staphylococcus aureus from coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42(11) : 4947 -55 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 12.

    Miles F, Voss L, Segedin E, Anderson BJ. Review of Staphylococcus aureus infections requiring admission to a paediatric intensive care unit. Arch Dis Child. 2005; 90(12) : 1274 -8 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 13.

    Turlej A, Hryniewicz W, Empel J. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (Sccmec) classification and typing methods: an overview. Pol J Microbiol. 2011; 60(2) : 95 -103 [PubMed]

  • 14.

    Shittu AO, Okon K, Adesida S, Oyedara O, Witte W, Strommenger B, et al. Antibiotic resistance and molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus in Nigeria. BMC Microbiol. 2011; 11 : 92 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 15.

    Armin S, Rouhipour A, Fallah F, Rahbar M, Ebrahimi M. Vancomycin and linezolid resistant staphylococcus in hospitalized children. Arch Pediatr Infect Dis. 2012; 1(1) : 4 -8 [DOI]

  • 16.

    Lamand V, Dauwalder O, Tristan A, Casalegno JS, Meugnier H, Bes M, et al. Epidemiological data of staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome in France from 1997 to 2007 and microbiological characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus associated strains. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012; 18(12) -21 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 17.

    Chung HJ, Jeon HS, Sung H, Kim MN, Hong SJ. Epidemiological characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from children with eczematous atopic dermatitis lesions. J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46(3) : 991 -5 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 18.

    Karlsson A, Saravia-Otten P, Tegmark K, Morfeldt E, Arvidson S. Decreased amounts of cell wall-associated protein A and fibronectin-binding proteins in Staphylococcus aureus sarA mutants due to up-regulation of extracellular proteases. Infect Immun. 2001; 69(8) : 4742 -8 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 19.

    Azimian A, Najar-Pirayeh S, Mirab-Samiee S, Naderi M. Occurrence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among clinical samples in tehran-iran and its correlation with polymorphism of specific accessory gene regulator (AGR) groups. Braz J Microbiol. 2012; 43(2) : 779 -85 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 20.

    Ho CM, Hsueh PR, Liu CY, Lee SY, Chiueh TS, Shyr JM, et al. Prevalence and accessory gene regulator (agr) analysis of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus among methicillin-resistant isolates in Taiwan--SMART program, 2003. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010; 29(4) : 383 -9 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 21.

    Kahl BC, Becker K, Friedrich AW, Clasen J, Sinha B, Von Eiff C, et al. agr-dependent bacterial interference has no impact on long-term colonization of Staphylococcus aureus during persistent airway infection of cystic fibrosis patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41(11) : 5199 -201 [PubMed]

  • 22.

    Moise-Broder PA, Sakoulas G, Eliopoulos GM, Schentag JJ, Forrest A, Moellering RC, Jr. Accessory gene regulator group II polymorphism in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is predictive of failure of vancomycin therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 38(12) : 1700 -5 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 23.

    Rutherford ST, Bassler BL. Bacterial quorum sensing: its role in virulence and possibilities for its control. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012; 2(11)[DOI][PubMed]

  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: