New Advances in Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: A Review Article

AUTHORS

Masoud Mardani 1 , Zahra Abtahian 1 , *

1 Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center , Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Tehran, IR Iran

How to Cite: Mardani M, Abtahian Z. New Advances in Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: A Review Article, Arch Pediatr Infect Dis. 2015 ; 3(1 TB):e22368. doi: 10.5812/pedinfect.22368.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases: 3 (1 TB); e22368
Published Online: January 25, 2015
Article Type: Review Article
Received: August 2, 2014
Revised: August 25, 2014
Accepted: September 4, 2014
Crossmark

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Context: It has been estimated that one-third of the world’s population are suffering from latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). In order to control tuberculosis in high-risk groups proper diagnosis and treatment is essential.

Evidence Acquisition: Useless and expensive tests such as unfocused population-based tests can lead to futile and unnecessary treatments. Targeted screening approaches and individualization of LTBI treatment protocols must be a priority.

Results: Diagnostic methods with immune based tests such as the tuberculin skin test (TST) or interferon gamma release assays (IGRA) can accurately detect LTBI. However, interferon-gamma release assays have higher specificity than TST in Bacille Camette-Gurin (BCG)-vaccinated populations; both tests are precise to identify latent tuberculosis. However, it is of great concern that both tests have insignificant roles in predicting risk of progression to active tuberculosis.

Conclusions: Here we review the clinical applications, advantages, and limitations of the tuberculin skin test and interferon-gamma release assays and provide an overview of the most recent systematic reviews conducted for the comparison of these tests.

Keywords

Latent Tuberculosis Interferon-gamma Release Tests BCG

Copyright © 2015, Pediartric Infections Research Center. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Context

Tuberculosis (TB) is a serious cause of morbidity and mortality all over the world (1). After HIV/AIDS, TB causes the greatest number of deaths due to a single infectious agent. According to released data 8.6 million people are infected by TB and 1.3 million die from TB. Most deaths related to TB (95%) occur in poor and middle-income countries; also TB is one of the three causes of death among women aged 15 to 44 years of age. According to statistics, 530000 children became ill with TB and 74000 HIV-negative children died from TB in 2012. People who are living with HIV are more exposed to death because of TB and combination of TB and HIV (2). Nowadays incidence and mortality from TB is at a steady rate, which is the result of governmental and non-governmental organization efforts and investments in the last decades in order to control this infection (3). To achieve the United Nations Millennium Goals of eliminating the disease by 2050, diagnosis and treatment of this active disease with new approaches to reduce this vast reservoir of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is vital (4). An important strategy for TB control is utilization of rapid, accurate, and inexpensive ways for detection of active TB. Owing to the fact that diagnosis of LTBI has a major role in controlling of tuberculosis, it is highly vital to find the best diagnostic strategies for LTBI. In the present paper, we reviewed the latest guidelines and articles by using a comprehensive search of reliable data-bases such as PubMed and ISI on diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis.

2. Purposeful Detection of Tuberculosis

Among high-risk groups, TB testing must be performed in order to treat LTBI. Once infection with M. tuberculosis is detected, control and evaluation of LTBI in high-risk groups for developing TB disease becomes highly important, hence targeted testing is essential and can prevent the spread of TB and control disease progression. In this way unfocused population-based testing is avoided as it is neither cost-effective nor useful and leads to unnecessary treatment (5).

Overall, TB afflicted patients belong to two major groups:

A) People who are at risk of exposure to TB patients including:

1) Close contact with TB afflicted patients

2) Immigrants from TB endemic regions

3) People who are working in institutions or hospitals that care for TB, nursing homes, or residential facilities for patients with HIV infection/AIDS

B) People with specific conditions who are at risk of progression from LTBI to TB disease:

1) HIV infected cases

2) Injection drug abusers

3) Those with radiographic evidence of prior healed TB

4) Those with low body weight (10% below ideal)

5) Patients with other medical conditions such as:

Silicosis, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure or on hemodialysis, gastrectomy, jejunoileal bypass, solid organ transplant, head and neck cancer

6) Recent tuberculin skin test (TST) converters (that is, people with baseline testing results who have an increase of 10 mm or more in the size of the TST reaction within a two-year period)

7) Infants and children under the age of five who have a positive TB test result (6). Note, the risk of progression is greatest in the first 1 or 2 years after infection (6).

3. Detection of Latent Tuberculosis Infection

Medical Records, TST or interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) results, chest radiograph, physical examination and sputum examinations in certain circumstances can be used for detection of LTBI. Before treatment of LTBI, the existence of TB disease must be excluded since inadequate treatment and development of drug resistance can lead to failure of treatment (6).

4. Latent Tuberculosis Infection and Disease Differentiation

4.1. Latent Tuberculosis Infection

Finding no symptoms and physical evidence of TB

Usually positive results for TST or IGRA tests

Normal Chest radiography

Negative respiratory smear and culture

Proper treatment of LTBI can prevent TB disease

4.2. Tuberculosis Disease

Fever, cough, chest pain, weight loss, night sweats, hemoptysis, fatigue, and decreased appetite are common symptoms of TB disease.

4.2.1. Positive Results for TST or IGRA Tests

Chest radiographs are abnormal in most cases of TB disease, however in patients with immunosuppression or extra-pulmonary disease the chest radiograph is normal.

Smear or culture of respiratory specimens is usually positive, except with extra-pulmonary disease or minimal or early pulmonary disease.

Transmission of TB bacteria to others requires treatment of TB diseases patients. Use of diagnostic tests for LTBI among individuals and populations at low risk for infection with M. tuberculosis is highly recommended. Testing is sometimes done to meet administrative or legal requirements for groups who are not considered to have an increased possibility of infection in the absence of other factors cited above, such as people meeting entrance requirements for certain schools and workplaces, despite Center of for Disease Control CDC recommendations .

5. Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection

In an individual patient there is no way to directly detect the presence of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Measurement of host immune responses as a surrogate for the presence of viable bacteria is the key for the assessment of latent infection (7).

5.1. Tuberculin Skin Testing

Tuberculin skin testing was the only diagnostic method for detecting LTBI until the beginning of this century. This method is based on a delayed hypersensitivity response which occurs when individuals contaminated with M. tuberculosis are exposed to certain antigenic components present in extracts of culture filtrates, “tuberculin”. T cells are sensitized by primary contamination and they are recruited to the skin where the tuberculin had been injected and release lymphokines in this type of infection. Local induration of the skin through local vasodilatation, edema, fibrin deposition, and recruitment of other inflammatory cells to the area are the results of the injection. A positive reaction can be accepted when the size of induration is greater than 5 mm, while various cut-off sizes should be considered (8).

5.1.1. Amplifying Phenomenon

After many years have passed since a patient has become infected with M. tuberculosis, the reaction with TST may become negative. Repeated positive reaction with TST is representative of reaction to the test. This is commonly referred to as the “booster phenomenon” and may incorrectly be interpreted as a skin test conversion (going from negative to positive). For this purpose the “two-step method” is suggested at the time of initial testing and for people who may be tested periodically (9) (Figure 1). There is no need for a second test when IGRAs are used for serial testing, since amplifying does not occur (6).

5.1.2. Tuberculin Skin Testing Limitations

1) Malnutrition, severe TB diseases and immunodeficiency diseases such as HIV can reduce TST sensitivity.

2) In places where non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are prevalent and in populations who have received Bacille Camette-Gurin (BCG) vaccination after infancy, decreased TST specificity might occur, however the effect of BCG vaccination on TST reactions is variable after 10 years or more, if vaccination is administered during infancy (10).

3) Two health care visits are needed for completing the TST, one for tuberculin injection and the second visit for measurement of induration, which results in loss of reading in approximately 10% of cases (11).

4) Intensity of diversity in measurement of reaction size persist which can be successfully reduced by adequate training (12, 13).

5) Remote infection, which has a lower risk of progression to disease, cannot be distinguished by one positive TST result (14). Tuberculin skin testing reversions are more common in older adults; estimated at 8% per year (15).

6) When additional tests become un-interpretable, it means that a serial TST has no place in monitoring treatment responses. Repeated injections of tuberculin are known to elicit the amplifier phenomenon, also a two-step tuberculin test is recommended at the time of first testing, in situations where serial testing is indicated, in order to reach this reason (16, 17). In low and medium-income countries with a high-TB incidence, diagnosis of LTBI, detection and treatment of active TB is difficult and should be a priority; however some of these countries could invest in detection and treatment of LTBI if an easier test was available (18, 19).

It seems that TST benefits from many advantages. Clinical applications of TST are widely studied and it has been widely used during the past century. For indication of Isoniazid Preventive Therapy (IPT) for different ages and risk groups cut-off points have been established (20). More importantly, the benefit of IPT in groups with a positive TST has been extensively proven, as has been the lack of benefit of IPT in TST-negative subjects (20, 21). Although the role of TST alone for evaluating the risk of progression to disease is limited, the main application of TST is to detect LTBI. For evaluation of risk of disease this testing method must be interpreted in light of the clinical situation and epidemiological history (6).

5.2. Interferon-Gamma Release Assays (IGRAs)

By measuring the immune response to TB proteins in whoe blood, IGRAs are used to determine if a person is infected with M. tuberculosis. Antigens derived from M. tuberculosis are mixed with peptides to stimulate immune systemresponse. White blood cells recognize the simulated antigens and release interfereon gamma (IFN-γ) in a person infected with M. tuberculosis (22). Two U.S Food and drug administration approved IGRAs are commercially are available in the United States:

QuantiFERON ®-TB Gold-in-Tube test (QFT-GIT)

T-SPOT ®.TB test

5.2.1. Advantages of IGRAs Include the Following

1. A single patient visit to conduct the test

2. No Booster phenomenon

3. A laboratory test not affected by health care worker's perception or bias

4. Results can be available within 24 hours

5. Unaffected by BCG and most environmental mycobacteria

5.2.2. Limitations of Interferon-Gamma Release Assays Include the Following

Once blood samples are collected, they should be processed within 8-30 hours.

There is limited data on the use of this method in groups such as children younger than five years of age, people recently exposed to TB, immunocompromised individuals, and those who are required be tested repeatedly (serial testing) (22). An algorithm for LTBI screening with IGRAs is presented in Figure 2 (23).

1) Risk stratification is based on the criteria established by the CDC. 2) After an exposure, consider waiting at least 4-7 weeks before testing. 3) In certain groups (ie. close contacts of patients with active TB), consider excluding active TB and treating for LTBI despite negative IGRA results. 4) IGRAs have lower sensitivity in children and immunocompromised patients.
Figure 2. 1) Risk stratification is based on the criteria established by the CDC. 2) After an exposure, consider waiting at least 4-7 weeks before testing. 3) In certain groups (ie. close contacts of patients with active TB), consider excluding active TB and treating for LTBI despite negative IGRA results. 4) IGRAs have lower sensitivity in children and immunocompromised patients.

5.2.3. Interferon-Gamma Release Assay for Special Populations

Distinct subpopulations such as children, patients living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA), other immunosuppressed patients (those with renal disease or using tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors), and healthcare workers can prove the accuracy of IGRA tests (24-31).

5.2.3.1. A) Immunosuppressed Patients

The sensitivity of IGRA tests has been examined for patients living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) and those with active TB. Sensitivities of both TST and IGRA tests were lower in PLWHA because both require an adequate immune response; this was indicated in 16 from 18 studies. The T-SPOT.TB test has a pooled sensitivity of 76% while QFT-GIT has a pooled sensitivity of 60%. The Pulmonary Medicine 5 seems to be slightly less affected by immunosuppression (19). However, only five studies compared their sensitivity head to head (32-36), with only one study showing Quantiferon GIT QFT-GIT with a greater sensitivity than T-SPOT.TB in PLWHA (36). A prospective study from Iran (by Mardani et al.) compared TST and Quantiferon TB gold in 50 HIV positive patients. This study showed no association between a positive TST and receiving highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART) or absolute CD4 count (29). Similarly, the association between QFT-G results and receiving HAART or CD4 counts was not significant. Although TST results were not significantly different in patients with CD4 < 200 versus CD4 > 200, the association between QFT-G results and CD4 cutoff of 200, reached statistical significance (29). Also the role of IGRA in patients with autoimmune disease has been analyzed by 14 studies (37-51); 10 of which were performed in countries where BCG vaccination is not routinely used (37-39, 42-44, 46, 47, 49, 50). Immunosuppressive therapy was variable or not yet started in most studies that included a small number of patients; also very few were conducted in countries with high-TB prevalence (51). In a study from Iran by Mardani et al. results of TST and Quantiferon TB Gold test were compared for lung and heart transplant patients. Of the 55 patients included in the study, three (5%) had positive tuberculin skin test results, and 11 (20%) had positive QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test results. The positivity for QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test was greater than the positivity for the tuberculin skin test, and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test more accurately determined the risk for latent tuberculosis infection (31). Overall, there is no study to Sum up the efficacy of IGRA tests for transplant patients under immunosuppressive therapy. When interpreting conversion and reversions in PLWHA, special caution must be taken. Declining immunity can lead to reversion and should alert the physician. In contrast, naive TST negative individuals with advanced HIV infection (CD4+ cell count < 200/μL) started on HAART for LTBI/TB treatment, should be retested for LTBI once they achieve CD4+ cell counts > 200/μL (52).

5.2.3.2. B) Children

The sensitivity and specificity of IGRA in older children exposed to index cases are similar compared to adults, as long as they are not infected by HIV; although a few studies have shown a lower sensitivity for IGRA tests in very young children (25, 53, 54). The lower sensitivity found for both TST and IGRAs among very young children might be explained by immune immaturity or having a population with underlying conditions that may interfere with immunity, such as co-infections with helminthes and malnutrition; although BCG is not expected to interfere with IGRAs (55). It should be concluded that in all children with active TB, sensitivity and specificity were similar for TST, QFT-G/QFT-GIT (QFT), and T-SPOT.TB (25).

5.2.3.3. C) Highly Exposed Populations and Serial Testing

Health care workers and prisoners, as well as patients at high risk of disease should be considered as highly exposed groups, such as PLWHA, and they should be screened for LTBI every 6 to 12 months. Boosting of IGRA responses is not seen if QFTGIT or T-SPOT.TB is done within three days of performing the TST, although it has been reported that tuberculin injection may also result this effect (56, 57). Furthermore, IGRA tests may be repeated, regardless of their previous results, unlike TST, which should only be repeated if previously negative. However, serial testing of subjects not undergoing treatment has indicated that there are high rates of spontaneous reversions and conversions, although it is always harder to know if conversion is spontaneous or a consequence of real TB infections (58, 59). Nonspecific infections and vaccines, laboratorial technique variability (such as blood withdrawal preparation), delay to and time of incubation, and the kit being used are other possible explanations for a conversion. The predictive value of IGRA (QFT) conversion for the development of TB disease is still controversial, and fluctuations in IFN-γ responses among serially tested individuals reported in longitudinal studies remain unexplained and nonspecific. Although there is some evidence that QFT-GIT conversion is related to a greater risk of progression to TB (60), spontaneous reversions are more likely to occur in subjects with borderline results, (56, 61). Such cases are interpreted as self-clearance of infection, yet there is not enough evidence for this conclusion (52, 62). Serial testing with QFT-GIT and T.SPOT-TB should be considered unreliable and is not recommended at least until the conversion and reversion phenomena are better understood.

6. Selecting a Test to Detect Tuberculosis Infection

However there are certain situations where results from both tests may be useful, although routine testing with both TST and IGRAs is NOT recommended.

For the following groups IGRAs is the preferred method of testing:

1. People who have poor rates of return for TST reading and interpretation such as homeless individuals

2. People who have been immunized by BCG vaccination

Otherwise without preference for other groups that are tested for LTBI, TST or IGRA can be used (6).

6.1. Guidelines From Professional Societies

There are screening guideline for latent tuberculosis infection in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom (Table 1). Although there are various recommendations yet they all endorse the use of IGRAs in some circumstances, with U.S. guidelines advising that IGRAs can be used interchangeably with the tuberculin skin test in most circumstances. The guidelines are likely to evolve as more data on IGRAs become available.

Since IGRAs became available commercially, there have been several publications on its accuracy, predictive value, cost-effectiveness, and its indications. Also these tests have been incorporated in national guidelines of many high-income countries (6).

Recently the World Health Organization (WHO) published a set of recommendations for low- and medium-income countries (LMIC) (6); more extrapolation in middle-income settings with high background TB infection is needed since most IGRA studies have been done in high-income countries. Moreover, IGRA performance differs in high-versus low-TB and HIV incidence settings, with relatively lower sensitivity in high-burden settings which is suggested by systematic reviews. Cost is one of the most important aspects against their use in LMICs.

Table 1. Screening Guidelines From the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom for Selected Groups at Risk for Latent Tuberculosis (TB) Infection a
Risk GroupUS GuidelineCanadian GuidelineUK Guideline
Close contacts of persons with infectious TBTST or IGRA, but not bothTST, with IGRA to confirm positive TSTTST, with IGRA to confirm positive TST
Persons who may not return for TST reading because of circumstances (e.g. homelessness or injection-drug use) or logistic difficultiesIGRA preferredno specific recommendationGRA preferred
Immunosuppressed persons (e.g. those infected with HIV or receiving treatment with prednisone or TNF-α inhibitor)TST or IGRA; use both if first is negative and suspicion is highTST, followed by IGRA if TST is negativeTST or IGRA
Foreign-born personsscreening only for those who have immigrated in past 5 yearss; use TST or IGRA, but not bothscreening only for those < 15 years old who have immigrated in past 2 years; use TST, with IGRA to confirm positive TSTscreening for new immigrants only; use TST with IGRA to confirm positive TST for those 5-15 years of age and IGRA for those 16-35 years of age
BCG vaccine recipients (if they belong to another risk group)IGRA preferredno specific recommendationTST or IGRA
Health care workers (screening program)TST or IGRA, but not bothTST preferredTST or IGRA, depending on specific circumstances
Children < 5 year oldTST preferredno specific recommendationTST preferred
Other risk groupsTST or IGRA, but not bothTST, with IGRA to confirm positive TSTTST, with IGRA to confirm positive TST

aThe sources for the US, Canadian and UK guidelines, respectively, are as follows: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Public Health Agency of Canada; and the UK; National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. BCG denotes Bacille Calmette–Guerin, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, IGRA interferon-γ release assay, and TST tuberculin skin test.

6.2. Special Considerations in Testing for Tuberculosis Infection

6.2.1. Bacille Camette-Gurin Vaccine

Confusion often results from the effect of BCG vaccine on TST results. Although periodic skin testing may prolong (boost) reactivity in vaccinated people, TST reactivity caused by BCG vaccine generally decreases with the passage of time. If people react to TST, those with a history of BCG vaccination can be tested and treated for LTBI. Based on risk stratification, regardless of BCG vaccination history, TST reactions should be interpreted. Specific antigens that do not cross react with BCG are used by IGRAs, thus positive reactions in BCG recipients do not occur with IGRA (6).

6.2.2. HIV Infection

For those with both LTBI and untreated HIV infection, the risk of progression from LTBI to TB disease is 7% to 10% each year. Patients with LTBI who are not suffering from HIV, have a 10% risk over their lifetime. Thus, the risk of progression to TB disease is 10 times greater for those who are HIV infected. Although this risk is still higher than that of HIV-negative individuals with LTBI but antiretroviral therapy for HIV reduces this risk. As soon as HIV status of HIV infected patients becomes known, they should be tested for LTBI. A negative TST or IGRA result does not exclude LTBI as they may have a compromised ability to react to tests for TB infection. Annual testing should be considered for HIV-infected individuals who are TST or IGRA negative on initial evaluation, and who are at risk of exposure to M. tuberculosis. The usefulness of anergy testing for HIV-infected individuals or others has not been demonstrated; therefore, it is not recommended. After the initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART), repeat testing for LTBI is recommended for HIV-infected individuals previously known to have negative TST or IGRA results. This is because the immune response may be restored by ART (63).

7. Contacts

1. For contacts of a person with infectious TB disease, retesting in 8-10 weeks after the end of exposure is indicated when the initial TST or IGRA result is negative. In contact investigations, retesting is not called two-step testing. The second test is needed to determine if infection occurred, but was too recent to be detected at the time of the first test.

2. Children under the age of five years and immunosuppressed individuals (e.g. HIV infected) who have negative TST or IGRA results should have a chest radiograph. If the chest radiograph is normal, treatment should be started for LTBI and another TST or IGRA should be performed 8-10 weeks after contact has ended.

3. If a repeat TST or IGRA result is positive, treatment should be continued. If this is negative, treatment can usually be discontinued.

4. If testing is repeated, the same type of test (TST or IGRA) should be used (6).

8. Pregnancy

1. TST is both safe and reliable throughout the course of pregnancy.

2. Only test if specific risk factors are present for acquiring LTBI or for progression of LTBI to TB disease

3. If a TST or IGRA reaction is positive, obtain a chest radiograph using proper shielding (64).

9. Discussion

In conclusion, although TST is a simple, reliable and available method but in some cases IGRA provides a better yield which helps in making rational decisions for treatment of LTBI. A coordinated strategy will be required to effectively tackle the reservoir of latent infection. Improved data are needed to more accurately estimate the scale of the problem and quantify the number of new infections occurring each year, and a redoubling of effort will be required to reduce this as far as possible by implementing currently recommended interventions. However, in order for widespread treatment of latent TB to be acceptable to the public, healthcare providers and policy makers, need to inform the general population. Major advances on the currently available diagnostic and interventional tools are required to control LTBI. Progress in identifying who is most likely to react and how this occurs will assist the development of more predictive diagnostic tests allowing interventions to be focused on those that will benefit most.

Acknowledgements

Footnote

References

  • 1.

    Kondratieva T, Azhikina T, Nikonenko B, Kaprelyants A, Apt A. Latent tuberculosis infection: What we know about its genetic control? Tuberculosis. 2014; [DOI]

  • 2.

    Shim TS. Diagnosis and Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection due to Initiation of Anti-TNF Therapy. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2014; 76(6) : 261 -8 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 3.

    Dye C, Watt CJ, Bleed DM, Hosseini SM, Raviglione MC. Evolution of tuberculosis control and prospects for reducing tuberculosis incidence, prevalence, and deaths globally. JAMA. 2005; 293(22) : 2767 -75 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 4.

    Dye C, Williams BG. Eliminating human tuberculosis in the twenty-first century. J R Soc Interface. 2008; 5(23) : 653 -62 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 5.

    Ahmad S. New approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. Respir Res. 2010; 11 : 169 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 6.

    CDC . Latent Tuberculosis Infection: A Guide for Primary Health Care Providers. 2013;

  • 7.

    Esmail H, Barry CE, 3rd, Wilkinson RJ. Understanding latent tuberculosis: the key to improved diagnostic and novel treatment strategies. Drug Discov Today. 2012; 17(9-10) : 514 -21 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 8.

    Huebner RE, Schein MF, Bass JJ. The tuberculin skin test. Clin Infect Dis. 1993; 17(6) : 968 -75 [PubMed]

  • 9.

    Pesanti EL. The negative tuberculin test. Tuberculin, HIV, and anergy panels. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994; 149(6) : 1699 -709 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 10.

    Kritzinger FE, Den Boon S, Verver S, Enarson DA, Lombard CJ, Borgdorff MW, et al. No decrease in annual risk of tuberculosis infection in endemic area in Cape Town, South Africa. Tropic Medic Inter Health. 2009; 14(2) : 136 -42

  • 11.

    Linas BP, Wong AY, Freedberg KA, Horsburgh CR, Jr. Priorities for screening and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in the United States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011; 184(5) : 590 -601 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 12.

    Bearman JE, Kleinman H, Glyer VV, Lacroix OM. A Study of Variability in Tuberculin Test Reading. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1964; 90 : 913 -9 [PubMed]

  • 13.

    Chaparas SD, Vandiviere HM, Melvin I, Koch G, Becker C. Tuberculin test. Variability with the Mantoux procedure. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1985; 132(1) : 175 -7 [PubMed]

  • 14.

    Menzies D, Gardiner G, Farhat M, Greenaway C, Pai M. Thinking in three dimensions: a web-based algorithm to aid the interpretation of tuberculin skin test results. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008; 12(5) : 498 -505 [PubMed]

  • 15.

    Grzybowski S, Allen EA. The Challenge of Tuberculosis in Decline. A Study Based on the Epidemiology of Tuberculosis in Ontario, Canada. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1964; 90 : 707 -20 [PubMed]

  • 16.

    Menzies D. Interpretation of repeated tuberculin tests. Boosting, conversion, and reversion. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999; 159(1) : 15 -21 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 17.

    Bass JA, Jr, Serio RA. The use of repeat skin tests to eliminate the booster phenomenon in serial tuberculin testing. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981; 123(4 Pt 1) : 394 -6 [PubMed]

  • 18.

    Menzies D, Al Jahdali H, Al Otaibi B. Recent developments in treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. Indian J Med Res. 2011; 133 : 257 -66 [PubMed]

  • 19.

    Metcalfe JZ, Everett CK, Steingart KR, Cattamanchi A, Huang L, Hopewell PC. release assays for active pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis in adults in lowand middle-income countries: systematic review and metaanalysis. Infecti Dis J. 204(4)

  • 20.

    Bucher HC, Griffith LE, Guyatt GH, Sudre P, Naef M, Sendi P, et al. Isoniazid prophylaxis for tuberculosis in HIV infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. AIDS. 1999; 13(4) : 501 -7 [PubMed]

  • 21.

    Samandari T, Agizew TB, Nyirenda S, Tedla Z, Sibanda T, Shang N, et al. 6-month versus 36-month isoniazid preventive treatment for tuberculosis in adults with HIV infection in Botswana: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet J. 2011; 377(9777) : 1588 -98 [DOI]

  • 22.

    Trajman A, Steffen RE, Menzies D. Interferon-Gamma Release Assays versus Tuberculin Skin Testing for the Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: An Overview of the Evidence. Pulm Med. 2013; 2013 : 601737 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 23.

    Todryk SM, Pathan AA, Keating S, Porter DW, Berthoud T, Thompson F, et al. The relationship between human effector and memory T cells measured by ex vivo and cultured ELISPOT following recent and distal priming. Immunology. 2009; 128(1) : 83 -91 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 24.

    Sarrazin H, Wilkinson KA, Andersson J, Rangaka MX, Radler L, van Veen K, et al. Association between tuberculin skin test reactivity, the memory CD4 cell subset, and circulating FoxP3-expressing cells in HIV-infected persons. J Infect Dis. 2009; 199(5) : 702 -10 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 25.

    Pollock NR, Campos-Neto A, Kashino S, Napolitano D, Behar SM. Discordant QuantiFERON-TB Gold test results among US healthcare workers with increased risk of latent tuberculosis infection: a problem or solution? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008; 29(9) : 878 -86 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 26.

    Diel R, Loddenkemper R, Niemann S, Meywald-Walter K, Nienhaus A. Negative and positive predictive value of a whole-blood interferon-gamma release assay for developing active tuberculosis: an update. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011; 183(1) : 88 -95 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 27.

    Horsburgh CR, Jr. Priorities for the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(20) : 2060 -7 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 28.

    Herrera V, Perry S, Parsonnet J, Banaei N. Clinical application and limitations of interferon-gamma release assays for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 52(8) : 1031 -7 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 29.

    Bianchi L, Galli L, Moriondo M, Veneruso G, Becciolini L, Azzari C, et al. Interferon-Gamma Release Assay Improves the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Children. Pediat Infect Dis J . 2009; 28(6) : 510 -4 [DOI]

  • 30.

    Mandalakas AM, Detjen AK, Hesseling AC, Benedetti A, Menzies D. Interferon-gamma release assays and childhood tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011; 15(8) : 1018 -32 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 31.

    Nenadic N, Kirin BK, Letoja IZ, Plavec D, Topic RZ, Dodig S. Serial interferon-gamma release assay in children with latent tuberculosis infection and children with tuberculosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012; 47(4) : 401 -8 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 32.

    Kim EY, Lim JE, Jung JY, Son JY, Lee KJ, Yoon YW. Performance of the tuberculin skin test and interferon-gamma release assay for detection of tuberculosis infection in immunocompromised patients in a BCG-vaccinated population. BMC Infect Dis. 2009; 9 : 207 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 33.

    Mardani M, Tabarsi P, Mohammadtaheri Z, Chitsaz E, Farokhzad E, Hadavand F. Performance of Quantiferon TB Gold test compared to tuberculin skin test in detecting latent tuberculosis infection in HIV- positive individuals in Iran. Ann Thorac Med. 2010; 5(1) : 43 -6

  • 34.

    Chang B, Park HY, Jeon K, Ahn JK, Cha HS, Koh EM, et al. Interferon-gamma release assay in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in arthritis patients treated with tumor necrosis factor antagonists in Korea. Clin Rheumatol. 2011; 30(12) : 1535 -41 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 35.

    Mardani M, Farshidpour M, Nekoonam M, Varahram F, Najafizadeh K, Mohammadi N, et al. Performance of QuantiFERON TB gold test compared with the tuberculin skin test for detecting latent tuberculosis infection in lung and heart transplant candidates. Exp Clin Transplant. 2014; 12(2) : 129 -32 [PubMed]

  • 36.

    Cattamanchi A, Smith R, Steingart KR, Metcalfe JZ, Date A, Coleman C, et al. Interferon-gamma release assays for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in HIV-infected individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011; 56(3) : 230 -8 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 37.

    Dheda K, van Zyl-Smit RN, Meldau R, Meldau S, Symons G, Khalfey H, et al. Quantitative lung T cell responses aid the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Thorax. 2009; 64(10) : 847 -53 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 38.

    Ling DI, Pai M, Davids V, Brunet L, Lenders L. Are interferon-gamma release assays useful for diagnosing active tuberculosis in a high-burden setting? Eur Respir J. 2011; 38(3) : 649 -56 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 39.

    Chee CB, Gan SH, Khinmar KW, Barkham TM, Koh CK, Liang S, et al. Comparison of sensitivities of two commercial gamma interferon release assays for pulmonary tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46(6) : 1935 -40 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 40.

    Leidl L, Mayanja-Kizza H, Sotgiu G, Baseke J, Ernst M, Hirsch C, et al. Relationship of immunodiagnostic assays for tuberculosis and numbers of circulating CD4+ T-cells in HIV infection. Eur Respir J. 2010; 35(3) : 619 -26 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 41.

    Markova R, Todorova Y, Drenska R, Elenkov I, Yankova M, Stefanova D. Usefulness of Interferon-Gamma Release Assays in the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis Infection in HIV-Infected Patients in Bulgaria. Biotech Equip J. 2014; 23(1) : 1103 -8 [DOI]

  • 42.

    Bartalesi F, Vicidomini S, Goletti D, Fiorelli C, Fiori G, Bartoloni A. QuantiFERON-TB Gold and the TST are both useful for latent tuberculosis infection screening in autoimmune diseases. Eur Respir J. 2009; 33(3) : 586 -93 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 43.

    Behar SM, Shin DS, Maier A, Coblyn J, Helfgott S, Weinblatt ME. Use of the T-SPOT.TB assay to detect latent tuberculosis infection among rheumatic disease patients on immunosuppressive therapy. J Rheumatol. 2009; 36(3) : 546 -51 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 44.

    Bocchino M, Matarese A, Bellofiore B, Giacomelli P, Santoro G. Performance of two commercial blood IFN-gamma release assays for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in patient candidates for anti-TNF-alpha treatment. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008; 27(10) : 907 -13 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 45.

    Cobanoglu N, Ozcelik U, Kalyoncu U, Ozen S, Kiraz S, Gurcan N. Interferongamma assays for the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection before using tumour necrosis factor-alpha blockers. Tuberc Lung Dis J. 2007; 11(11) : 1177 -82

  • 46.

    Gogus F, Gunendi Z, Karakus R, Erdogan Z, Hizel K, Atalay F. Comparison of tuberculin skin test and QuantiFERON-TB gold in tube test in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases living in a tuberculosis endemic population. Clin Exp Med. 2010; 10(3) : 173 -7 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 47.

    Kleinert S, Kurzai O, Elias J, Marten K, Engelke C, Feuchtenberger M, et al. Comparison of two interferon-gamma release assays and tuberculin skin test for detecting latent tuberculosis in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010; 69(4) : 782 -4 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 48.

    Kwakernaak AJ, Houtman PM, Weel JF, Spoorenberg JP, Jansen TL. A comparison of an interferon-gamma release assay and tuberculin skin test in refractory inflammatory disease patients screened for latent tuberculosis prior to the initiation of a first tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor. Clin Rheumatol. 2011; 30(4) : 505 -10 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 49.

    Laffitte E, Janssens JP, Roux-Lombard P, Thielen AM, Barde C, Marazza G, et al. Tuberculosis screening in patients with psoriasis before antitumour necrosis factor therapy: comparison of an interferon-gamma release assay vs. tuberculin skin test. Br J Dermatol. 2009; 161(4) : 797 -800 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 50.

    Marques CD, Duarte AL, de Lorena VM, Souza JR, Souza WV, Gomes Yde M, et al. Evaluation of an interferon gamma assay in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2009; 30(1) : 57 -62 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 51.

    Martin J, Walsh C, Gibbs A, McDonnell T, Fearon U, Keane J, et al. Comparison of interferon {gamma} release assays and conventional screening tests before tumour necrosis factor {alpha} blockade in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010; 69(1) : 181 -5 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 52.

    Matulis G, Juni P, Villiger PM, Gadola SD. Detection of latent tuberculosis in immunosuppressed patients with autoimmune diseases: performance of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen-specific interferon gamma assay. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008; 67(1) : 84 -90 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 53.

    Chiappini E, Della Bella C, Bonsignori F, Sollai S, Amedei A, Galli L, et al. Potential role of M. tuberculosis specific IFN-gamma and IL-2 ELISPOT assays in discriminating children with active or latent tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2012; 7(9)[DOI][PubMed]

  • 54.

    Schoepfer AM, Flogerzi B, Fallegger S, Schaffer T, Mueller S, Nicod L, et al. Comparison of interferon-gamma release assay versus tuberculin skin test for tuberculosis screening in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103(11) : 2799 -806 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 55.

    Vassilopoulos D, Stamoulis N, Hadziyannis E, Archimandritis AJ. Usefulness of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Elispot) compared to tuberculin skin testing for latent tuberculosis screening in rheumatic patients scheduled for anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment. Addendum. Rheumat J. 2008; 35(7) : 1464

  • 56.

    Smith R, Cattamanchi A, Steingart KR, Denkinger C, Dheda K, Winthrop KL, et al. Interferon-gamma release assays for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: evidence in immune-mediated inflammatory disorders. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2011; 23(4) : 377 -84 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 57.

    Mazurek GH, Jereb JA, Vernon A, LoBue P, Goldberg S, Castro KG, et al. Updated guidelines for using interferon gamma release assays to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, United States, 2010. 2010;

  • 58.

    Okada K, Mao TE, Mori T, Miura T, Sugiyama T, Yoshiyama T, et al. Performance of an interferon-gamma release assay for diagnosing latent tuberculosis infection in children. Epidemiol Infect. 2008; 136(9) : 1179 -87 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 59.

    Petrucci R, Abu Amer N, Gurgel RQ, Sherchand JB, Doria L, Lama C, et al. Interferon gamma, interferon-gamma-induced-protein 10, and tuberculin responses of children at high risk of tuberculosis infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008; 27(12) : 1073 -7 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 60.

    Thomas TA, Mondal D, Noor Z, Liu L, Alam M, Haque R, et al. Malnutrition and helminth infection affect performance of an interferon gamma-release assay. Pediatrics. 2010; 126(6) -9 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 61.

    Choi JC, Shin JW, Kim JY, Park IW, Choi BW, Lee MK. The effect of previous tuberculin skin test on the follow-up examination of whole-blood interferon-gamma assay in the screening for latent tuberculosis infection. Chest. 2008; 133(6) : 1415 -20 [DOI][PubMed]

  • 62.

    Hill PC, Brookes RH, Fox A, Jackson-Sillah D, Jeffries DJ, Lugos MD, et al. Longitudinal assessment of an ELISPOT test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. PLoS Med. 2007; 4(6)[DOI][PubMed]

  • 63.

    Suthar AB, Lawn SD, del Amo J, Getahun H, Dye C, Sculier D, et al. Antiretroviral therapy for prevention of tuberculosis in adults with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2012; 9(7)[DOI][PubMed]

  • 64.

    Worjoloh A, Kato-Maeda M, Osmond D, Freyre R, Aziz N, Cohan D. Interferon gamma release assay compared with the tuberculin skin test for latent tuberculosis detection in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118(6) : 1363 -70 [DOI][PubMed]

  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: